This is a copy of the e-mail I sent this afternoon to one of the myriad organizations whose list I’m on to solicit for funds.
As you can see, it really “got my Irish up” when it arrived. Good thing today is “Grouch Day,” ha!
Once again, I have received in the mail a package from you requesting a donation. This time, it was marked “Second Notice.” What’s that all about, I ask???
“Second Notice” sounds to me as if you’re a bill collector, and I’m a deadbeat. I am not.
“Second Notice” implies that you’ve tried before and failed. That tells me you’re doing the same thing — sending out multiple notices in hopes of guilting people to give — and that’s a waste of everybody’s time and somebody’s resources.
“Second Notice” has a coercion feeling to it, as if I’m expected to donate. I am not.
I’m self-employed. Thus, I don’t have a wealth of surplus money lying around for me to dole out willy-nilly. I work hard for my money and am frankly tired of all you organizations trying desperately to cut me out of the picture and grab some for yourselves.
Yes, I donate to charity, plenty of charities. But I’ll do that on my schedule, not yours, thank you very much.
I’ve had it up to here with your organization and regardless of how much I donate, yours won’t be on my list. You might as well STOP sending me stuff and save your efforts for somebody else.
Will it help? Will it stop the onslaught of “dunning” notices I receive?
I doubt it. But if I can make a dent in the stack, or remove a few from the list, I’ll be happy.
Most of us receive far too much junk mail, whether it’s in our home postal box or via e-mail. We complain about it, throw it into the trash, and move on to something else.
Today I decided I’d had enough. I don’t begrudge an organization for trying to solicit funds. Many times, that’s how they keep afloat. But forcing people to give isn’t charity.
It’s coercion. And that’s against the law.
What do you think?